ECCENTRIC REDUCERS DIMENSIONS

  • riz_john
  • riz_john's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
16 years 3 months ago - 16 years 3 months ago #7273 by riz_john
ECCENTRIC REDUCERS DIMENSIONS was created by riz_john
hello,

Can anybody help me pls.....i am about to fabricate an eccentric reducer 44"x14"......i wanna know what will be the length. Is it possible to use rolled plate ASTM A516 with a thicknes of 12.7 rather that combination of reducers to save money.

It will be used in burried chilled water piping. Operating temp is 39F and Operation Pressure is 145 psi.

Thanks very much!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 3 months ago - 16 years 3 months ago #4473 by Jop
Replied by Jop on topic ECCENTRIC REDUCERS DIMENSIONS
This post brings up a lot of questions.
First,
How far is it from the point where you would add this (44" x 14" ) reducer and the point where the 14" line will turn to it's user?

Second,
Why is this header still 44" at this point? I do not presume to know your piping layout but I would have thought you would have had periodic size reductions in the header as the water was distributed to the users. The result might have been a more normal size reduction.

Third,
Why not explore other methods for joining the 14" to the 44"? Example: If you do in fact need to have the header at 44" at this point then run the 14" back along side the 44" then elbow in and stub into the side of the 44" header.

Do it once and Do it Right

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 3 months ago - 16 years 3 months ago #4475 by gpsvn
Replied by gpsvn on topic Re: ECCENTRIC REDUCERS DIMENSIONS

This post brings up a lot of questions.
First,
How far is it from the point where you would add this (44" x 14" ) reducer and the point where the 14" line will turn to it's user?

Second,
Why is this header still 44" at this point? I do not presume to know your piping layout but I would have thought you would have had periodic size reductions in the header as the water was distributed to the users. The result might have been a more normal size reduction.

Third,
Why not explore other methods for joining the 14" to the 44"? Example]

An excellent response. Thank you

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 years 3 months ago - 16 years 3 months ago #4476 by 11echo
Replied by 11echo on topic riz_john ...Your problem has some
riz_john ...Your problem has some "interesting issues", as others here have pointed out. But to look at your problem at face value, I'd say there is no standard length dimension for a fabricated fitting. And in your case because your reducing the main header size down to a size less then half the original diameter, the longer the fitting the better ...to get the best flow-thru you can in this situation. The other issue I have with your fitting is WHERE is this going to be fabricated? ...Shop or Field?
...If this is field you'd probably get an "orange peel" design. This is where the welders cut pie-shaped sections out of a piece of pipe and then bent the remaining parts down on themselves and re-weld together. Sounds complicated, and it is to a point. But this type of field fabrication has and is done in the oil fields all the time & for a number of years ...so nothing new.
Shop fabrication you might end up with a rolled plate type fitting or you still might get the "orange-peel" construction. It would all depends on what you as the client wanted and what the shop was equipped to do. Your 2 main issues here, as I see it, are going to be fabrication and transportation costs.
That’s my $0.02, Good Luck!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Jop
Time to create page: 0.185 seconds